Lawrence v. State

84 S.E. 582, 143 Ga. 264, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 378
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 9, 1915
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 84 S.E. 582 (Lawrence v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lawrence v. State, 84 S.E. 582, 143 Ga. 264, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 378 (Ga. 1915).

Opinion

Beck, J.

1. Where, upon the trial of one under an indictment charging murder, the court properly charged the jury upon the subject of voluntary manslaughter, that grade of homicide being involved under the evidence in the case, and, following the definition of voluntary manslaughter as contained in the Penal Code, § 65, the court charged: “You will observe from this definition of voluntary manslaughter, that, in order to reduce a homicide from murder to voluntary manslaughter, there must have been some actual assault upon the person killing by the person killed, or an attempt by the person killed to commit serious personal injury on the person killing, or other equivalent circumstances sufficient to justify the excitement of passion, and to exclude all idea of deliberation or malice, express or implied. . . If you believe in this case that this defendant killed the deceased, and at the time of the killing or just before the killing that the deceased made an actual assault upon him or was attempting to commit a serious injury upon him, or other equivalent circumstances to justify the excitement of passion, and he killed him for those reasons, then the crime would not be murder but voluntary manslaughter,” it was not error for the court to refuse to charge further, upon written request, that “An assault and battery is a serious injury, as contemplated by the law of voluntary manslaughter given you in charge.” So far as the request to charge was legal and pertinent, it had been sufficiently covered by the charge upon the subject of voluntary manslaughter, as given.

2, The evidence authorized the verdict rendered, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. ■

Judqment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rembert v. State
45 S.E.2d 798 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 S.E. 582, 143 Ga. 264, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-v-state-ga-1915.