Lawrence v. State
This text of 68 Ga. 289 (Lawrence v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The verdict was a necessary consequence of the evidence in this case.
(a.) Human intent can only be ascertained by acts and conduct; and the law presumes that every act which is in itself unlawful, was criminally intended, until the contrary is made to appear.
2. To constitute a principal in the second degree, one must aid and abet the principal in the first degree. To charge that aiding or abetting is sufficient, is error.
(a.) Under the evidence in this case, the charge does not appear to have injured the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 Ga. 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-v-state-ga-1881.