Lawrence v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Arizona Supreme Court

Lawrence v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

915 P.2d 668, 185 Ariz. 269, 1996 Ariz. LEXIS 53

CourtArizona Supreme Court

DecidedApril 26, 1996

DocketNo. CV-95-0410-PR

StatusPublished

This text of 915 P.2d 668 (Lawrence v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lawrence v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 915 P.2d 668, 185 Ariz. 269, 1996 Ariz. LEXIS 53 (Ark. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Court heard oral argument in this case on April 25, 1996. Having considered the arguments of counsel and given further consideration to the pleadings and briefs filed herein, Vice Chief Justice Zlaket and Justice Moeller voted to affirm the Court of Appeals’ opinion, which reversed the trial court’s order granting summary judgment to State Farm; Justices Martone and Jones voted to vacate the Court of Appeals’ opinion and affirm the trial court’s order granting summary judgment. Because Chief Justice Feldman had previously recused himself and therefore did not participate in the consideration of this case, the Court is unable to resolve the issues. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the order granting review is vacated.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Review is denied.

/s/ Thomas A. Zlaket THOMAS A. ZLAKET Vice Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Court heard oral argument in this case on April 25, 1996. Having considered the arguments of counsel and given further consideration to the pleadings and briefs filed herein, Vice Chief Justice Zlaket and Justice Moeller voted to affirm the Court of Appeals’ opinion, which reversed the trial court’s order granting summary judgment to State Farm; Justices Martone and Jones voted to vacate the Court of Appeals’ opinion and affirm the trial court’s order granting summary judgment. Because Chief Justice Feldman had previously recused himself and therefore did not participate in the consideration of this case, the Court is unable to resolve the issues. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the order granting review is vacated.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Review is denied.

/s/ Thomas A. Zlaket THOMAS A. ZLAKET Vice Chief Justice

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

915 P.2d 668, 185 Ariz. 269, 1996 Ariz. LEXIS 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-ariz-1996.