Lawrence v. State

79 So. 312, 202 Ala. 14, 1918 Ala. LEXIS 274
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMay 30, 1918
Docket6 Div. 779.
StatusPublished

This text of 79 So. 312 (Lawrence v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lawrence v. State, 79 So. 312, 202 Ala. 14, 1918 Ala. LEXIS 274 (Ala. 1918).

Opinion

SOMERVILLE, J.

Defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree and sentenced to death. The trial court overruled a motion to quash the special venire, and also a motion to quash the indictment, on the ground that, defendant being a negro and the victim a white man, defendant was denied the right to have competent members of his race on the grand jury that indicted him, and on the petit jury that tried him, by reason of the designed exclusion of their names from the jury boxes of Pickens county, thereby infringing upon his constitutional rights to trial by an impartial jury, to due process of law, and to the equal protection of the laws.

The record shows that defendant offered no evidence in support of these motions, and no bill of exceptions is presented. For this reason, if there were no other, the motions were properly overruled. The subject is fully discussed in Green v. State, 73 Ala. 26. Our inspection of the record discovers no error in the trial proceedings, and the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Green v. State
73 Ala. 26 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1882)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 So. 312, 202 Ala. 14, 1918 Ala. LEXIS 274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-v-state-ala-1918.