Lawrence v. Smith

5 Mass. 362
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1809
StatusPublished
Cited by23 cases

This text of 5 Mass. 362 (Lawrence v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lawrence v. Smith, 5 Mass. 362 (Mass. 1809).

Opinion

By the Court.

As a plea in abatement to the jurisdiction, the plea is unquestionably bad, as it gives jurisdiction to no other Court of this state. But the Court will not proceed in the suit, as it does not appear that either of the defendants, or any estate of theirs, is within the jurisdiction of the commonwealth.

Let an entry be made that the plea is adjudged bad; and let a further entry be made that, for the reasons aforesaid, all further proceedings stay.

See statute of 1797, c. 50. § L, relating to suits against defendants out of the state, also to giving notice to defendants sued

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Steward v. State
103 N.E. 316 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1913)
Moody v. Port Clyde Development Co.
66 A. 967 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1907)
McDermott v. Warren, Brookfield, & Spencer Street Railway Co.
172 Mass. 197 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1898)
Young v. Providence & Stonington Steamship Co.
23 N.E. 579 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1890)
Allin v. Connecticut River Lumber Co.
6 L.R.A. 416 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1890)
Powers v. Mitchell
75 Me. 364 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1883)
Von Roy v. Blackman
28 F. Cas. 1272 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Louisiana, 1877)
Richardson v. Rich
66 Me. 249 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1876)
Norvell v. Hittle
23 Ind. 346 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1864)
Pingree v. Coffin
78 Mass. 288 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1858)
Pierse v. Irvine, Stone & McCormick
1 Minn. 369 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1857)
Mace v. Woodward
38 Me. 426 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1854)
Peck v. Barnum
24 Vt. 75 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1852)
Otis v. Wakeman
1 Hill & Den. 604 (New York Supreme Court, 1841)
Beaubien v. Brinckerhoff
3 Ill. 269 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1840)
Heilman v. Martin
2 Ark. 158 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1840)
Carlisle v. Weston
38 Mass. 535 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1839)
Perkins v. Perkins
7 Conn. 558 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1829)
Picquet v. Swan
19 F. Cas. 609 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1828)
Guild v. Richardson
23 Mass. 364 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1828)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Mass. 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-v-smith-mass-1809.