Lawrence v. Shreve

26 Mo. 492
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedMarch 15, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases

This text of 26 Mo. 492 (Lawrence v. Shreve) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lawrence v. Shreve, 26 Mo. 492 (Mo. 1858).

Opinion

Napton, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

We think the plaintiff should have been allowed to take a nonsuit in this case. The statute says : The plaintiff shall be allowed to dismiss his suit, or take a nonsuit, at any time before the same is finally submitted to the jury, or the court sitting as a jury, or to the court.” When a case is tried by a jury it has been the uniform construction of this law, in practice, to allow a party to get the opinion of the court upon the law of his case in the form of instructions and then withdraw his suit if that opinion is unfavorable. The same opportunity ought to bo afforded in cases where the court is permitted to decide the law and try the facts as a jury, if the parties request a declaration of the law from the court.

In this case the court took the question of law under advisement, and when the decision was made the whole case was decided together, and no opportunity given for a nonsuit. The instruction given for the defendant was merely an instruction upon the evidence that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover; but the character of the instruction can not vary the rights of the parties, and would rather seem to make it more imperative on the court to give the plaintiff an opportunity of determining whether he would proceed further with the case. The plaintiff can not insist upon immediate determination of the law asked for by the instructions offered; but if the court takes them under advisement, proceeding on with other business, it would seem to be reasonable, where no day is announced or by some rule of court established in [494]*494which the decision will be made known, that the parties or their counsel should be informed when the court is ready to detei'mine the instructions. Any other practice would deprive plaintiff of the right given him by the statute to take a nonsuit at any time before the final submission of the case.

The judgment will be reversed, and the plaintiff has leave to enter a nonsuit;

the other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Piatt v. Heim & Overly Realty Co.
117 S.W.2d 327 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1938)
Piatt v. Realty Co.
117 S.W.2d 327 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1938)
Kosinski v. Hines
187 P. 712 (Washington Supreme Court, 1920)
Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. Bolton
134 Tenn. 447 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1915)
Bunting v. Stone
154 S.W. 807 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1913)
National Bank of Commerce v. Butler
143 S.W. 1117 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1912)
Grattan v. Suedmeyer
129 S.W. 1038 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1910)
Strottman v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.
128 S.W. 187 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1910)
Connecticut Fire Ins. v. Manning
177 F. 893 (Eighth Circuit, 1910)
Lawyers' Co-Operative Publishing Co. v. Gordon
73 S.W. 155 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1903)
Houston's Admr. v. Thompson's Admr.
87 Mo. App. 63 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1901)
Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. Metalstaff
101 F. 769 (Eighth Circuit, 1900)
Gassman v. Jarvis
94 F. 603 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana, 1899)
Mayer v. Old
51 Mo. App. 214 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1892)
Carroll v. Inter-State Rapid Transit Co.
107 Mo. 653 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1891)
Wilson & Co. v. Stark
42 Mo. App. 376 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1890)
Polack v. Hannauer
26 Mo. App. 260 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1887)
Wood v. Nortman
85 Mo. 298 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1884)
McLean v. Stuve
15 Mo. App. 317 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 Mo. 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-v-shreve-mo-1858.