Lawrence v. Rockland County Board of Cooperative Educational Services

93 A.D.3d 766, 940 N.Y.S.2d 321
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 20, 2012
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 93 A.D.3d 766 (Lawrence v. Rockland County Board of Cooperative Educational Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lawrence v. Rockland County Board of Cooperative Educational Services, 93 A.D.3d 766, 940 N.Y.S.2d 321 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), dated January 18, 2011, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On the morning of October 7, 2008, the plaintiff, a nursing student, arrived early for class at a building owned by the defendant, Rockland County Board of Cooperative Educational Services (hereinafter BOCES). Her classroom was locked, and she sat down in a chair in the hallway. The chair collapsed and the plaintiff fell to the floor, sustaining personal injuries.

BOCES established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence demonstrating that it neither created nor had notice, actual or constructive, of the defective condition of the chair (see Miles v Hicksville U.F.S.D., 56 AD3d 625, 625-626 [2008]; Loiacono v Stuyvesant Bagels, Inc., 29 AD3d 537, 538 [2006]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The subject chair was located in a hallway outside a classroom, giving numerous persons access to it and, thus, BOCES did not have exclusive control over it. Consequently, under the circumstances here, the plaintiff could not invoke the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur (see Miles v Hicksville U.F.S.D., 56 AD3d at 626; Dulgov v City of New York, 33 AD3d 584, 585 [2006]; Loiacono v Stuyvesant Bagels, Inc., 29 AD3d at 538; Chini v Wendcentral Corp., 262 AD2d 940 [1999]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted BOCES’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Dillon, J.E, Florio, Chambers and Lott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Newisky v. United Artists Kaufman Astoria 14 Regal Cinemas
2018 NY Slip Op 6880 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 A.D.3d 766, 940 N.Y.S.2d 321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-v-rockland-county-board-of-cooperative-educational-services-nyappdiv-2012.