Lawrence v. Richman Group of Connecticut, LLC

199 F. App'x 55
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided October 11, 2006·No. No. 06-0258-cv·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-appellant John F. Lawrence appeals the district court’s grant of motions to dismiss his two Amended Complaints, which alleged breach of contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, conversion, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, civil theft, violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, and unjust enrichment. We presume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, the procedural history, and the scope of the issues presented on appeal.

We affirm for substantially the reasons given by the district court in its opinions. We have carefully considered all of Lawrence’s arguments and find them to be without merit. The judgment of the district court is therefore AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lawrence v. Richman Group of Connecticut, LLC, 199 F. App'x 55 (2d Cir. 2006).

199 F. App'x 55 (Lawrence v. Richman Group of Connecticut, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rhee v. Sante Ventures
S.D. New York, 2023