Lawrence v. Pond

17 Mass. 432
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 15, 1821·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Curia.

The return of the sheriff, as to the qualification of the appraisers, cannot now be questioned.

In the cases where actions have been sued upon judgments, and maintained notwithstanding a levy on real estate, there has been some defect of title apparent upon the return. In such case the creditor is not bound to record his levy, but may waive it and avail himself of his judgment. But after seisin is delivered by the sheriff, [352]*352under a lawful levy, which devests the title of the debtor, the creditor cannot waive his levy, and resort to his judgment.

If in the case of Ladd vs. Blunt, the defendant, in place of demurring to the replication, had filed a rejoinder alleg- [ * 435 ] ing * that the creditor had neglected to record the execution and levy, the judgment might have been different from what it was.

Plaintiff nonsuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lawrence v. Pond, 17 Mass. 432 (Mass. 1821).

17 Mass. 432 (Lawrence v. Pond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Inhabitants of Winthrop v. Inhabitants of Athol
216 Mass. 79 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1913)
Dallinger v. Richardson
57 N.E. 224 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1900)
Inhabitants of Shutesbury v. Inhabitants of Hadley
133 Mass. 242 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1882)
Von Roy v. Blackman
28 F. Cas. 1272 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Louisiana, 1877)
Tobey v. City of Taunton
119 Mass. 404 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1876)
Brabrook v. Boston Five Cents Savings Bank
104 Mass. 228 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1870)
Dwight v. Peart
24 Barb. 55 (New York Supreme Court, 1857)
Carver v. Jackson
29 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1830)