Lawrence v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.

168 N.E.2d 74, 130 Ind. App. 18, 1960 Ind. App. LEXIS 99
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 1, 1960
Docket19,386
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 168 N.E.2d 74 (Lawrence v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lawrence v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 168 N.E.2d 74, 130 Ind. App. 18, 1960 Ind. App. LEXIS 99 (Ind. Ct. App. 1960).

Opinion

Bierly, C. J.

This is an action for money damages instituted in the Superior Court of Yigo County No. Two by the appellant against the appellees, Pennsylvania Railroad and S. A. Leidel. Plaintiff refused to plead over following ruling of the court on defendant’s motion addressed to plaintiff’s first paragraph of amended complaint, whereupon on motion by defendants, the court rendered judgment for the defendants on said paragraph of complaint that plaintiff take nothing thereby.

Trial was by a jury upon issues formed by the second paragraph of plaintiff’s amended complaint against defendant, Pennsylvania Railroad Company, and defendant’s answer thereto. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant. The appellant thereupon filed a *20 motion for a new trial which the court overruled. In due course, this appeal was perfected and transcript and assignment of errors filed February 23, 1960.

The transcript discloses no judgment on such verdict, and it is certified as being a true and correct copy of the record, hence we assume there was no judgment entered.

The 1958 Revision of the Supreme Court Rule 2-3 provides:

“No appeal will be dismissed as of right because the case was not finally disposed of in the court below as to all issues and parties, but upon suggestion or discovery of such a situation the appellate tribunal may, in its discretion, suspend consideration until disposition is made of such issues. . . .”

By virtue of this ruling, we have concluded to and do now suspend consideration of this appeal until such time as the Superior Court of Vigo County No. Two finally disposes of the issues involved in this case by the entry of an appropriate judgment on the verdict of the jury.

The Clerk of the Vigo Circuit Court, ex-officio Clerk of Superior Court of Vigo County No. Two is hereby ordered to certify a copy of such judgment, when entered, to the Clerk of this Court, and the same is hereby ordered thereupon to become a part of the transcript of the record heretofore filed in this appeal. Ax v. Schloot (1945), 116 Ind. App. 303, 64 N. E. 2d 31.

Note. — Reported in 168 N. E. 2d 74.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hale v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division
454 N.E.2d 882 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1983)
Minor v. Condict
360 N.E.2d 857 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1977)
Clouse v. Peden
179 N.E.2d 586 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 N.E.2d 74, 130 Ind. App. 18, 1960 Ind. App. LEXIS 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-v-pennsylvania-railroad-co-indctapp-1960.