Lawrence v. Lawrence

275 A.D.2d 985, 713 N.Y.S.2d 418, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9496
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 29, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 275 A.D.2d 985 (Lawrence v. Lawrence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lawrence v. Lawrence, 275 A.D.2d 985, 713 N.Y.S.2d 418, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9496 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: In this custody dispute between the infant’s grandmother (petitioner) and the infant’s aunt and uncle (respondents), Family Court properly awarded respondents custody of the infant pursuant to a voluntary custodial arrangement made by the mother, who was estranged from petitioner and fearful that petitioner would limit her contact with the infant. Petitioner, who has custody of the mother’s other children, instituted this proceeding to unite the infant with her siblings. A parent has a fundamental constitutional right to make a decision of this nature (see, Troxel v Granville, 530 US 57, 65-66), and courts may not interfere with such a decision in the absence of extraordinary circumstances (see, Matter of Bennett v Jeffreys, 40 NY2d 543, 545-546). “Examples of cause or necessity permitting displacement of or intrusion on parental control would be fault or omission by the parent seriously affecting the welfare of a child, the preservation of the child’s freedom from serious physical harm, illness or death, or the child’s right to an education, and the like” (Matter of Bennett v Jeffreys, supra, at 546). Petitioner failed to establish that the separation of the infant from her siblings will seriously affect the infant’s welfare, particularly in view of the fact that respondents are committed to fostering a relationship between the infant and her siblings. (Appeal from Order of Chautauqua County Family Court, Hartley, J. — Custody.) Present— Green, J. P., Pine, Wisner, Kehoe and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Stacy H. v. Jessica T.
2026 NY Slip Op 00960 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026)
Matter of Leslie LL. v. Robert NN.
208 A.D.3d 1479 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Matter of Keenan R. v. Julie L.
2004 NY Slip Op 24104 (NYC Family Court, 2004)
Keenan R. v. Julie L.
3 Misc. 3d 819 (New York Family Court, 2004)
Scialdo v. Kernan
301 A.D.2d 884 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
275 A.D.2d 985, 713 N.Y.S.2d 418, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-v-lawrence-nyappdiv-2000.