Lawrence v. Howell

2 N.W. 617, 52 Iowa 62
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedOctober 9, 1879
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2 N.W. 617 (Lawrence v. Howell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lawrence v. Howell, 2 N.W. 617, 52 Iowa 62 (iowa 1879).

Opinion

Adams, J.

Section 2870 of the Code provides that “where no appearance is made default shall not be had until the court determines from an inspection of the record that notice has been given as required by the Code.” '

The record referred to must be a return of service. It is insisted, therefore, that a return of service is jurisdictional because there can be no determination' from an inspection of a record which has no existence. The position is certainly plausible, but where service is actually made, it appears to us that jurisdiction is acquired so far as the person is concerned. The provision that default shall not be had until the court determines from an inspection of the record that notice has been given, is, we think, merely directory. It follows that the irregularity complained of did not have the effect to render the judgment void.

There being some evidence that service was actually made, the judgment must be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coster v. Jensen
257 N.W. 303 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1934)
Mintle v. Sylvester
197 Iowa 424 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1924)
Cowan v. Farrell
75 N.W. 771 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 N.W. 617, 52 Iowa 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-v-howell-iowa-1879.