Lawrence v. Holder

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lawrence v. Holder. Read the opinion of the Court — 717 F.3d 1036
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 1, 2013·No. 07-74829·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALFREDO ROLANDO LAWRENCE , No. 07-74829 Petitioner,

Agency No.

v. A040-199-868

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney ORDER General, Respondent.

Filed August 1, 2013

Before: Ferdinand F. Fernandez, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, and Jay S. Bybee, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The listing for Petitioner’s counsel, which appears at page two of the opinion filed on May 21, 2013, is AMENDED as follows: the listing as “Duane M. Hamilton, Chow & Hamilton, Buena Park, California, for Petitioner” is deleted and replaced with “Duane M. Hamilton, Chow & Hamilton, Fullerton, California, for Petitioner.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lawrence v. Holder, (9th Cir. 2013).

Lawrence v. Holder (Lawrence v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.