Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Lawrence v. Herkimer County

Lawrence v. Herkimer County

239 A.D. 754
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1933
StatusPublished

This text of 239 A.D. 754 (Lawrence v. Herkimer County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lawrence v. Herkimer County, 239 A.D. 754 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The notice of lien failed to state the kind of labor for which the lien was claimed. (Toop v. Smith, 181 N. Y. 283.) In view of the total amount of liens and the amount received by the National Surety Company for the completion of the contract with additions, and the amount in the county treasury available for the payment of liens, there is no reason to pass on the other questions raised. All concur except Thompson and Crosby, JJ., who dissent and vote for modification on the law in accordance with the dissenting opinion of Crosby, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ringle v. . Wallis Iron Works
44 N.E. 175 (New York Court of Appeals, 1896)
Aeschlimann v. . Presbyterian Hospital
59 N.E. 148 (New York Court of Appeals, 1901)
Toop v. . Smith
73 N.E. 1113 (New York Court of Appeals, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
239 A.D. 754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-v-herkimer-county-nyappdiv-1933.