Lawrence v. Herkimer County
239 A.D. 754
Opinions
The notice of lien failed to state the kind of labor for which the lien was claimed. (Toop v. Smith, 181 N. Y. 283.) In view of the total amount of liens and the amount received by the National Surety Company for the completion of the contract with additions, and the amount in the county treasury available for the payment of liens, there is no reason to pass on the other questions raised. All concur except Thompson and Crosby, JJ., who dissent and vote for modification on the law in accordance with the dissenting opinion of Crosby, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lawrence v. Herkimer County, 239 A.D. 754 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).
239 A.D. 754 (Lawrence v. Herkimer County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ringle v. . Wallis Iron Works
44 N.E. 175 (New York Court of Appeals, 1896)
Aeschlimann v. . Presbyterian Hospital
59 N.E. 148 (New York Court of Appeals, 1901)
Toop v. . Smith
73 N.E. 1113 (New York Court of Appeals, 1905)