Lawrence v. Equipments Denis, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Lawrence v. Equipments Denis, Inc.

880 P.2d 973, 130 Or. App. 335, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 1385

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedSeptember 14, 1994

Docket9202-00901; CA A80683

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 880 P.2d 973 (Lawrence v. Equipments Denis, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lawrence v. Equipments Denis, Inc., 880 P.2d 973, 130 Or. App. 335, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 1385 (Or. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff was injured in a work-related accident caused by an electrically defective machine manufactured by Equipments Denis, Inc. He reached a settlement of his workers’ compensation claim with his employer, Howard-Cooper Corporation, and brings this third-party strict liability action against Equipments Denis.

Plaintiff obtained a jury verdict for economic damages of $398,978.10 and noneconomic damages of $750,000. The trial court reduced the judgment by the amount of the workers’ compensation settlement. It further reduced the award of noneconomic damages by $250,000 pursuant to ORS 18.560(1), which limits the award of noneconomic damages to $500,000, “except for claims subject to ORS 30.260 to 30.300 and claims subject to ORS chapter 656.” On appeal, plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in applying the damage cap to this claim. We have already held, in Tenold v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 127 Or App 511, 873 P2d 413 (1994), that the noneconomic damage cap imposed by ORS 18.560(1) is unconstitutional. We therefore remand this action to the trial court to enter a judgment for the amount of the jury verdict less the amount of the settlement with Howard-Cooper Corporation.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to enter judgment for the amount awarded by the jury verdict less the amount of settlement with Howard-Cooper Corporation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff was injured in a work-related accident caused by an electrically defective machine manufactured by Equipments Denis, Inc. He reached a settlement of his workers’ compensation claim with his employer, Howard-Cooper Corporation, and brings this third-party strict liability action against Equipments Denis.

Plaintiff obtained a jury verdict for economic damages of $398,978.10 and noneconomic damages of $750,000. The trial court reduced the judgment by the amount of the workers’ compensation settlement. It further reduced the award of noneconomic damages by $250,000 pursuant to ORS 18.560(1), which limits the award of noneconomic damages to $500,000, “except for claims subject to ORS 30.260 to 30.300 and claims subject to ORS chapter 656.” On appeal, plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in applying the damage cap to this claim. We have already held, in Tenold v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 127 Or App 511, 873 P2d 413 (1994), that the noneconomic damage cap imposed by ORS 18.560(1) is unconstitutional. We therefore remand this action to the trial court to enter a judgment for the amount of the jury verdict less the amount of the settlement with Howard-Cooper Corporation.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to enter judgment for the amount awarded by the jury verdict less the amount of settlement with Howard-Cooper Corporation.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

880 P.2d 973, 130 Or. App. 335, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 1385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-v-equipments-denis-inc-orctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack