Lawrence v. Decca Records, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lawrence v. Decca Records, Inc.

12 A.D.2d 762, 210 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12941

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 31, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 762 (Lawrence v. Decca Records, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lawrence v. Decca Records, Inc., 12 A.D.2d 762, 210 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12941 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered on October 25, 1960 in a stockholders’ derivative action, granting plaintiff-respondent’s motion to examine defendants-appellants before trial, unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellants, and the motion denied, with $10 costs, with leave to renew on a showing of special circumstances by factual allegations of evidential value. (New York County Supreme Court Trial Term Rules, rule XI; Van Aalten v. Mack, 7 A D 2d 289; Aine v. Goldberg, 10 A D 2d 573; Steinberg v. Altschuler, 12 A D 2d 479.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered on October 25, 1960 in a stockholders’ derivative action, granting plaintiff-respondent’s motion to examine defendants-appellants before trial, unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellants, and the motion denied, with $10 costs, with leave to renew on a showing of special circumstances by factual allegations of evidential value. (New York County Supreme Court Trial Term Rules, rule XI; Van Aalten v. Mack, 7 A D 2d 289; Aine v. Goldberg, 10 A D 2d 573; Steinberg v. Altschuler, 12 A D 2d 479.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 762, 210 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-v-decca-records-inc-nyappdiv-1961.