Lawrence v. Continental Insurance Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Lawrence v. Continental Insurance Co.

199 So. 2d 400, 1967 La. App. LEXIS 5213

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJune 1, 1967

DocketNo. 2017

StatusPublished

This text of 199 So. 2d 400 (Lawrence v. Continental Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lawrence v. Continental Insurance Co., 199 So. 2d 400, 1967 La. App. LEXIS 5213 (La. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

TATE, Judge.

The plaintiffs appeal from a judgment sustaining an exception of non-joinder of an alleged indispensable party defendant. Subsequently, the suit was dismissed when, after amendment attempting to implead the allegedly indispensable party, he was dismissed from the suit since Louisiana courts could not exercise personal jurisdiction over this non-resident minor nor of his nonresident father. The plaintiffs then perfected a subsequent appeal from this dismissal, Docket No. 2031 of this court.

[401]*401For the reasons assigned in that companion appeal, decided by us this same date, 199 So.2d 398, we reverse the judgment of the trial court sustaining the exception of non-joinder, and we remand the case for further proceedings not inconsistent with the views expressed herein. The defendant-appellant is to pay the costs of this appeal.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TATE, Judge.

The plaintiffs appeal from a judgment sustaining an exception of non-joinder of an alleged indispensable party defendant. Subsequently, the suit was dismissed when, after amendment attempting to implead the allegedly indispensable party, he was dismissed from the suit since Louisiana courts could not exercise personal jurisdiction over this non-resident minor nor of his nonresident father. The plaintiffs then perfected a subsequent appeal from this dismissal, Docket No. 2031 of this court.

[401]*401For the reasons assigned in that companion appeal, decided by us this same date, 199 So.2d 398, we reverse the judgment of the trial court sustaining the exception of non-joinder, and we remand the case for further proceedings not inconsistent with the views expressed herein. The defendant-appellant is to pay the costs of this appeal.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 So. 2d 400, 1967 La. App. LEXIS 5213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-v-continental-insurance-co-lactapp-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack