Lawrence v. City of Boston

119 Mass. 126, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 88
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 10, 1875
StatusPublished
Cited by40 cases

This text of 119 Mass. 126 (Lawrence v. City of Boston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lawrence v. City of Boston, 119 Mass. 126, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 88 (Mass. 1875).

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

Beals was not a party to the record. He defended this suit, not by reason of any relation to the city, or liability for the act for which this suit was brought, when that act was done , but by virtue of a subsequent contract between himself and the city. His previous declarations, made when his interests were adverse to those of the city, were not admissible in evidence, except to contradict him; and not being offered for that purpose, they were rightly excluded.

The question whether Freeland was qualified to testify to his opinion of the value of the premises was within the discretion of the presiding judge, and no error in law is shown in the exercise of that discretion.

The instructions to the jury were such as have been usually given in similar cases in this Commonwealth, and were correct and sufficient. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frank v. Assessors of Skowhegan
329 A.2d 167 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1974)
Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation v. Worcester County Trust Co.
26 N.E.2d 305 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1940)
Portland Silk Co. v. City of Middletown
4 A.2d 422 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1939)
Alfred J. Sweet, Inc. v. City of Auburn
180 A. 803 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1935)
Maher v. Commonwealth
291 Mass. 343 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1935)
Jolt v. City of Salem
276 Mass. 297 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1931)
County of Los Angeles v. Signal Realty Co.
261 P. 536 (California Court of Appeal, 1927)
United States v. Golden
1 F.2d 543 (D. Minnesota, 1923)
United States v. Percansky
298 F. 991 (D. Minnesota, 1923)
Inhabitants of Westport v. County Commissioners
246 Mass. 556 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1923)
The Cushing
285 F. 617 (S.D. New York, 1922)
United States v. New River Collieries Co.
276 F. 690 (Third Circuit, 1921)
National City Bank v. United States
275 F. 855 (S.D. New York, 1921)
Kafka v. Davidson
160 N.W. 1021 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1917)
Grandison v. National Bank of Commerce
231 F. 800 (Second Circuit, 1916)
Sandy Valley & Elkhorn Railway Co. v. Bentley
171 S.W. 178 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1914)
Smith v. Commonwealth
96 N.E. 666 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1911)
Stephens v. State
55 So. 940 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1911)
Cornell-Andrews Smelting Co. v. Boston & Providence Railroad
89 N.E. 118 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 Mass. 126, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-v-city-of-boston-mass-1875.