Lawrence v. Christensen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lawrence v. Christensen

31 A.D.2d 986, 299 N.Y.S.2d 399, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4470

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 10, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 31 A.D.2d 986 (Lawrence v. Christensen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lawrence v. Christensen, 31 A.D.2d 986, 299 N.Y.S.2d 399, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4470 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Trial Term in Schenectady County, which restored this action to the General Calendar. The Justice presiding at the calendar part ascertained, without factual contradiction, that the ease had been removed from the deferred calendar and appeared on the Ready [987]*987Calendar prior to the expiration of one year, and thus within the rule, and that its purported dismissal as remaining on the deferred calendar beyond that time was through clerical error. Order affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Cooke, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum by the Court. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Trial Term in Schenectady County, which restored this action to the General Calendar. The Justice presiding at the calendar part ascertained, without factual contradiction, that the ease had been removed from the deferred calendar and appeared on the Ready [987]*987Calendar prior to the expiration of one year, and thus within the rule, and that its purported dismissal as remaining on the deferred calendar beyond that time was through clerical error. Order affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Cooke, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.D.2d 986, 299 N.Y.S.2d 399, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-v-christensen-nyappdiv-1969.