IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
AUGUSTA DIVISION
DION ANTWON LAWRENCE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CV 124-108 ) CHARLES B. WEBSTER DETENTION ) CENTER; LT. CHEATHAM; LT. ASHLEY; ) and SERGEANT CUYLER, ) ) Defendants.1 ) _________
O R D E R _________
Plaintiff, detained at Charles B. Webster Detention Center in Augusta, Georgia, has submitted to the Court for filing an amended complaint brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Because he is proceeding IFP, Plaintiff’s amended complaint must be screened to protect potential defendants. Phillips v. Mashburn, 746 F.2d 782, 785 (11th Cir. 1984) (per curiam); Al-Amin v. Donald, 165 F. App’x 733, 736 (11th Cir. 2006) (per curiam). I. SCREENING THE AMENDED COMPLAINT In his amended complaint, Plaintiff names the following Defendants in their individual and official capacities: (1) Charles B. Webster Detention Center (“CBWDC”), (2) Lt.
1 The Court DIRECTS the CLERK to correct the spelling of Defendants Cheatham and Cuyler’s names on the docket in accordance with the above caption, which is consistent with Plaintiff’s amended complaint. (See doc. no. 15, pp. 1-3.) Cheatham, (3) Lt. Ashley, and (4) Sergeant Cuyler. (Doc. no. 15, pp. 2-3.) Taking all of Plaintiff’s allegations as true, as the Court must for purposes of the present screening, the facts are as follows. While detained at CBWDC, Plaintiff informed Lt. Cheatham and Sergeant Cuyler that
a group of inmates was going to kill him. (Id. at 4.) Despite this warning, Lt. Cheatham and Sergeant Cuyler placed Plaintiff in F-Pod, the same dorm as that group of inmates. (Id.) Lt. Cheatham and Sergeant Cuyler also hung up on plaintiff’s girlfriend when she advocated for Plaintiff’s placement in a dorm where he would be safe. (Id.) On July 29th, 2023, between 2:30 and 3:30 PM, the group of inmates set a fire in the dorm to “get to” Plaintiff. (Id.) Plaintiff warned Lt. Ashley that the group of inmates only set the fire to get to Plaintiff, but Lt. Ashley required Plaintiff to evacuate to the yard with the group of inmates anyway. (Id.) In the yard, plaintiff was stabbed multiple times in his head, neck, and arm by inmate Crawford. (Id. at 5.) As a result of his stab wounds, Plaintiff nearly lost his life and required emergency surgery to
restore blood flow to his brain. (Id.) For relief, Plaintiff requests monetary damages and “free my charges.” (Id. at 5.) Liberally construing Plaintiff’s allegations in his favor and granting him the benefit of all reasonable inferences to be derived from the facts alleged, the Court finds Plaintiff has arguably stated a viable claim for deliberate indifference to his safety against Defendants Cheatham, Cuyler, and Ashley. See Lane v. Philbin, 835 F.3d 1302, 1307-08 (11th Cir. 2016). Accordingly, process shall issue as to these defendants. In a companion Report and Recommendation, the Court recommends dismissal of Defendant CBWDC. II. INSTRUCTIONS IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that service of process shall be effected on Defendants Cheatham, Cuyler, and Ashley. The United States Marshal shall mail a copy of the amended complaint, (doc. nos. 14, 15), and this Order by first-class mail and request that each Defendant
waive formal service of the summons. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). Individual defendants have a duty to avoid unnecessary costs of serving the summons, and if a defendant fails to comply with the request for waiver, the defendant must bear the costs of personal service unless good cause can be shown for failure to return the waiver. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(2). A defendant whose return of the waiver is timely does not have to answer the amended complaint until sixty days after the date the Marshal mails the request for waiver. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(3). However, service must be effected
within ninety days of the date of this Order, and the failure to do so may result in the dismissal of any unserved defendant or the entire case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Plaintiff is responsible for providing sufficient information for the Marshal to identify and locate each Defendant to effect service. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiff shall serve upon the defendants, or upon their defense attorney(s) if appearance has been entered by counsel, a copy of every further pleading or other document submitted to the Court. Plaintiff shall include with the papers to be filed a
certificate stating the date a true and correct copy of any document was mailed to the defendant or their counsel. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5; Loc. R. 5.1. Every pleading shall contain a caption setting forth the name of the court, the title of the action, and the file number. Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a). Any paper received by a District Judge or Magistrate Judge that has not been properly filed with the Clerk of Court or that fails to include a caption or certificate of service will be returned. It is Plaintiff’s duty to cooperate fully in any discovery that may be initiated by the defendants. Upon being given at least five days’ notice of the scheduled deposition date, Plaintiff shall appear and permit his deposition to be taken and shall answer, under oath and solemn
affirmation, any question that seeks information relevant to the subject matter of the pending action. Failing to answer questions at the deposition or giving evasive or incomplete responses to questions will not be tolerated and may subject Plaintiff to severe sanctions, including dismissal of this case. The defendants shall ensure Plaintiff’s deposition and any other depositions in the case are taken within the 140-day discovery period allowed by this Court’s Local Rules. Plaintiff must pursue this case; if Plaintiff does not press the case forward, the Court may dismiss it for want of prosecution. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41; Loc. R. 41.1. If Plaintiff wishes to obtain
facts and information about the case from the defendants, Plaintiff must initiate discovery. See generally Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 through 37 (containing the rules governing discovery and providing for the basic methods of discovery). Plaintiff should begin discovery promptly and complete it within four months after the filing of the first answer of a defendant named in the amended complaint screened herein. Interrogatories are a practical method of discovery for pro se litigants. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 33. Interrogatories shall not contain more than twenty-five questions. Id. Plaintiff must have the
Court’s permission to propound more than one set of interrogatories to a party.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
AUGUSTA DIVISION
DION ANTWON LAWRENCE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CV 124-108 ) CHARLES B. WEBSTER DETENTION ) CENTER; LT. CHEATHAM; LT. ASHLEY; ) and SERGEANT CUYLER, ) ) Defendants.1 ) _________
O R D E R _________
Plaintiff, detained at Charles B. Webster Detention Center in Augusta, Georgia, has submitted to the Court for filing an amended complaint brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Because he is proceeding IFP, Plaintiff’s amended complaint must be screened to protect potential defendants. Phillips v. Mashburn, 746 F.2d 782, 785 (11th Cir. 1984) (per curiam); Al-Amin v. Donald, 165 F. App’x 733, 736 (11th Cir. 2006) (per curiam). I. SCREENING THE AMENDED COMPLAINT In his amended complaint, Plaintiff names the following Defendants in their individual and official capacities: (1) Charles B. Webster Detention Center (“CBWDC”), (2) Lt.
1 The Court DIRECTS the CLERK to correct the spelling of Defendants Cheatham and Cuyler’s names on the docket in accordance with the above caption, which is consistent with Plaintiff’s amended complaint. (See doc. no. 15, pp. 1-3.) Cheatham, (3) Lt. Ashley, and (4) Sergeant Cuyler. (Doc. no. 15, pp. 2-3.) Taking all of Plaintiff’s allegations as true, as the Court must for purposes of the present screening, the facts are as follows. While detained at CBWDC, Plaintiff informed Lt. Cheatham and Sergeant Cuyler that
a group of inmates was going to kill him. (Id. at 4.) Despite this warning, Lt. Cheatham and Sergeant Cuyler placed Plaintiff in F-Pod, the same dorm as that group of inmates. (Id.) Lt. Cheatham and Sergeant Cuyler also hung up on plaintiff’s girlfriend when she advocated for Plaintiff’s placement in a dorm where he would be safe. (Id.) On July 29th, 2023, between 2:30 and 3:30 PM, the group of inmates set a fire in the dorm to “get to” Plaintiff. (Id.) Plaintiff warned Lt. Ashley that the group of inmates only set the fire to get to Plaintiff, but Lt. Ashley required Plaintiff to evacuate to the yard with the group of inmates anyway. (Id.) In the yard, plaintiff was stabbed multiple times in his head, neck, and arm by inmate Crawford. (Id. at 5.) As a result of his stab wounds, Plaintiff nearly lost his life and required emergency surgery to
restore blood flow to his brain. (Id.) For relief, Plaintiff requests monetary damages and “free my charges.” (Id. at 5.) Liberally construing Plaintiff’s allegations in his favor and granting him the benefit of all reasonable inferences to be derived from the facts alleged, the Court finds Plaintiff has arguably stated a viable claim for deliberate indifference to his safety against Defendants Cheatham, Cuyler, and Ashley. See Lane v. Philbin, 835 F.3d 1302, 1307-08 (11th Cir. 2016). Accordingly, process shall issue as to these defendants. In a companion Report and Recommendation, the Court recommends dismissal of Defendant CBWDC. II. INSTRUCTIONS IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that service of process shall be effected on Defendants Cheatham, Cuyler, and Ashley. The United States Marshal shall mail a copy of the amended complaint, (doc. nos. 14, 15), and this Order by first-class mail and request that each Defendant
waive formal service of the summons. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). Individual defendants have a duty to avoid unnecessary costs of serving the summons, and if a defendant fails to comply with the request for waiver, the defendant must bear the costs of personal service unless good cause can be shown for failure to return the waiver. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(2). A defendant whose return of the waiver is timely does not have to answer the amended complaint until sixty days after the date the Marshal mails the request for waiver. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(3). However, service must be effected
within ninety days of the date of this Order, and the failure to do so may result in the dismissal of any unserved defendant or the entire case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Plaintiff is responsible for providing sufficient information for the Marshal to identify and locate each Defendant to effect service. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiff shall serve upon the defendants, or upon their defense attorney(s) if appearance has been entered by counsel, a copy of every further pleading or other document submitted to the Court. Plaintiff shall include with the papers to be filed a
certificate stating the date a true and correct copy of any document was mailed to the defendant or their counsel. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5; Loc. R. 5.1. Every pleading shall contain a caption setting forth the name of the court, the title of the action, and the file number. Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a). Any paper received by a District Judge or Magistrate Judge that has not been properly filed with the Clerk of Court or that fails to include a caption or certificate of service will be returned. It is Plaintiff’s duty to cooperate fully in any discovery that may be initiated by the defendants. Upon being given at least five days’ notice of the scheduled deposition date, Plaintiff shall appear and permit his deposition to be taken and shall answer, under oath and solemn
affirmation, any question that seeks information relevant to the subject matter of the pending action. Failing to answer questions at the deposition or giving evasive or incomplete responses to questions will not be tolerated and may subject Plaintiff to severe sanctions, including dismissal of this case. The defendants shall ensure Plaintiff’s deposition and any other depositions in the case are taken within the 140-day discovery period allowed by this Court’s Local Rules. Plaintiff must pursue this case; if Plaintiff does not press the case forward, the Court may dismiss it for want of prosecution. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41; Loc. R. 41.1. If Plaintiff wishes to obtain
facts and information about the case from the defendants, Plaintiff must initiate discovery. See generally Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 through 37 (containing the rules governing discovery and providing for the basic methods of discovery). Plaintiff should begin discovery promptly and complete it within four months after the filing of the first answer of a defendant named in the amended complaint screened herein. Interrogatories are a practical method of discovery for pro se litigants. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 33. Interrogatories shall not contain more than twenty-five questions. Id. Plaintiff must have the
Court’s permission to propound more than one set of interrogatories to a party. Discovery materials should not be filed routinely with the Clerk of the Court; exceptions include when the Court directs filing; when a party needs such materials in connection with a motion or response, and then only to the extent necessary; and when needed for use at trial. If Plaintiff wishes to file a motion to compel pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, he should first contact the attorney for defendant and try to work out the problem; if Plaintiff proceeds with the motion to compel, he should also file a statement certifying that he has contacted opposing counsel in a good faith effort to resolve any dispute about discovery. Loc. R. 26.5. Plaintiff must maintain a set of records for the case. If papers are lost and new copies are
required, these may be obtained from the Clerk of the Court at the standard cost of fifty cents per page. Under this Court’s Local Rules, a party opposing a motion to dismiss shall file and serve his response to the motion within fourteen days of its service. “Failure to respond shall indicate that there is no opposition to a motion.” Loc. R. 7.5. Therefore, if Plaintiff fails to respond to a motion to dismiss, the Court will assume that there is no opposition to defendant’s motion and grant the dismissal.
A response to a motion for summary judgment must be filed within twenty-one days after service of the motion. Loc. R. 7.5, 56.1. A failure to respond shall indicate that there is no opposition to the motion. Loc. R. 7.5. Furthermore, each material fact set forth in a defendant’s statement of material facts will be deemed admitted unless specifically controverted by an opposition statement. Should a defendant file a motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff is advised that he will have the burden of establishing the existence of a genuine issue as to any material fact in this case. That burden cannot be carried by reliance on the conclusory allegations contained
within the complaint. Should a defendant’s motion for summary judgment be supported by affidavit, Plaintiff must file counter-affidavits if he desires to contest the defendant’s statement of the facts. Should Plaintiff fail to file opposing affidavits setting forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial, the consequences are these: any factual assertions made in the defendant’s affidavits will be accepted as true and summary judgment will be entered against Plaintiff pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. While this action is pending, Plaintiff shall immediately inform this Court □□□ opposing counsel of any change of address. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this case. SO ORDERED this 10th day of January, 2025, at Augusta, Georgia.
BRIAN E. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA