Lawrence v. Central Plaza Bank & Trust Co.
489 So. 2d 224, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1292, 1 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 843, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8190
Opinion
Affirmed. The issue of whether a bank followed reasonable commercial standards pursuant to section 673.419(3), Florida Statutes (1983), is an issue of fact to be decided by the trier of fact. See Forys v. McLaughlin, 436 So.2d 280, 282 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Travelers Insurance Co. v. Jefferson National Bank, 404 So.2d 1131, 1133 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Barnett Bank of Miami Beach v. Lipp, 364 So.2d 28, 30 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Siegel Trading Co. v. Coral Ridge National Bank, 328 So.2d 476, 478 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lawrence v. Central Plaza Bank & Trust Co., 489 So. 2d 224, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1292, 1 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 843, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8190 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).
489 So. 2d 224 (Lawrence v. Central Plaza Bank & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jordan v. State
489 So. 2d 224 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)