Lawrence v. Argus Pictures, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lawrence v. Argus Pictures, Inc.

263 A.D. 854, 32 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7008

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 16, 1942·Published

Opinion

The claim that Mrs. Harwin was attempting to evade service is not sustained by the record. Order unanimously modified by granting the motion of the defendant Florence V. Harwin to vacate the warrant of attachment, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to said defendant against the respondent, and with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent against appellant, Argus Pictures, Inc., with leave to the defendant' Argus Pictures, Inc., to answer or otherwise move with respect to the complaint, within ten days after service of order on payment of said costs. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The claim that Mrs. Harwin was attempting to evade service is not sustained by the record. Order unanimously modified by granting the motion of the defendant Florence V. Harwin to vacate the warrant of attachment, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to said defendant against the respondent, and with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent against appellant, Argus Pictures, Inc., with leave to the defendant' Argus Pictures, Inc., to answer or otherwise move with respect to the complaint, within ten days after service of order on payment of said costs. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Lawrence v. Argus Pictures, Inc., 263 A.D. 854, 32 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7008 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

263 A.D. 854 (Lawrence v. Argus Pictures, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.