Lawrence v. Argus Pictures, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lawrence v. Argus Pictures, Inc.

263 A.D. 854, 32 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7008

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 16, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D. 854 (Lawrence v. Argus Pictures, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lawrence v. Argus Pictures, Inc., 263 A.D. 854, 32 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7008 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

The claim that Mrs. Harwin was attempting to evade service is not sustained by the record. Order unanimously modified by granting the motion of the defendant Florence V. Harwin to vacate the warrant of attachment, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to said defendant against the respondent, and with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent against appellant, Argus Pictures, Inc., with leave to the defendant' Argus Pictures, Inc., to answer or otherwise move with respect to the complaint, within ten days after service of order on payment of said costs. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The claim that Mrs. Harwin was attempting to evade service is not sustained by the record. Order unanimously modified by granting the motion of the defendant Florence V. Harwin to vacate the warrant of attachment, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to said defendant against the respondent, and with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent against appellant, Argus Pictures, Inc., with leave to the defendant' Argus Pictures, Inc., to answer or otherwise move with respect to the complaint, within ten days after service of order on payment of said costs. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 854, 32 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-v-argus-pictures-inc-nyappdiv-1942.