Lawrence Tearl v. William Donald Schaeffer, Separately and in Individual Capacity

52 F.3d 322, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17581, 1995 WL 227303
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 18, 1995·No. 95-6232·Published

Opinion

52 F.3d 322
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Lawrence TEARL, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
William Donald SCHAEFFER, Separately and in Individual
Capacity, Defendant--Appellee.

No. 95-6232.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 15, 1995
Decided: April 18, 1995

Lawrence Tearl, Appellant Pro Se.

Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tearl v. Schaeffer, No. CA-95-272-N (D. Md. Feb. 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lawrence Tearl v. William Donald Schaeffer, Separately and in Individual Capacity, 52 F.3d 322, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17581, 1995 WL 227303 (4th Cir. 1995).

52 F.3d 322 (Lawrence Tearl v. William Donald Schaeffer, Separately and in Individual Capacity) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.