Lawrence Tearl v. William Donald Schaeffer, Separately and in Individual Capacity

Fourth Circuit

Lawrence Tearl v. William Donald Schaeffer, Separately and in Individual Capacity

52 F.3d 322, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17581, 1995 WL 227303

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 18, 1995

Docket95-6232

StatusPublished

This text of 52 F.3d 322 (Lawrence Tearl v. William Donald Schaeffer, Separately and in Individual Capacity) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lawrence Tearl v. William Donald Schaeffer, Separately and in Individual Capacity, 52 F.3d 322, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17581, 1995 WL 227303 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

52 F.3d 322
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Lawrence TEARL, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
William Donald SCHAEFFER, Separately and in Individual
Capacity, Defendant--Appellee.

No. 95-6232.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 15, 1995
Decided: April 18, 1995

Lawrence Tearl, Appellant Pro Se.

Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tearl v. Schaeffer, No. CA-95-272-N (D. Md. Feb. 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

52 F.3d 322
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Lawrence TEARL, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
William Donald SCHAEFFER, Separately and in Individual
Capacity, Defendant--Appellee.

No. 95-6232.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 15, 1995
Decided: April 18, 1995

Lawrence Tearl, Appellant Pro Se.

Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tearl v. Schaeffer, No. CA-95-272-N (D. Md. Feb. 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 F.3d 322, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17581, 1995 WL 227303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-tearl-v-william-donald-schaeffer-separate-ca4-1995.