Lawrence Tearl v. Correctional Medical System, Robert Granger, Doctor, Nevzat Turkman, Doctor

936 F.2d 567, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 19806, 1991 WL 113609
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 28, 1991
Docket90-6158
StatusUnpublished

This text of 936 F.2d 567 (Lawrence Tearl v. Correctional Medical System, Robert Granger, Doctor, Nevzat Turkman, Doctor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lawrence Tearl v. Correctional Medical System, Robert Granger, Doctor, Nevzat Turkman, Doctor, 936 F.2d 567, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 19806, 1991 WL 113609 (4th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

936 F.2d 567
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Lawrence TEARL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SYSTEM, Robert Granger, Doctor, Nevzat
Turkman, Doctor, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-6158.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 2, 1991.
Decided June 28, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Edward S. Northrop, Senior District Judge. (CA-90-1232-N)

Lawrence Tearl, appellant pro se.

Philip Melton Andrews, Kramon & Graham, P.A., Baltimore, Md., for appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE, WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence Tearl appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tearl v. Correctional Medical System, CA-90-1232-N (D.Md. Sept. 18, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
936 F.2d 567, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 19806, 1991 WL 113609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-tearl-v-correctional-medical-system-rober-ca4-1991.