Lawrence S. Osborne v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Lawrence S. Osborne v. United States

259 F.2d 180

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedSeptember 16, 1958

Docket14412_1

StatusPublished

This text of 259 F.2d 180 (Lawrence S. Osborne v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lawrence S. Osborne v. United States, 259 F.2d 180 (D.C. Cir. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On this appeal from a judgment of-conviction of possession of narcotics, not in the original stamped package 1 and illegally imported, 2 and of assaults on both a federal narcotics officer and a District of Columbia policeman in performance of their duties, 3 counsel appointed by this court has ably and conscientiously presented the several questions worthy of consideration in determining whether the judgment should be reversed. We have considered each of these questions but find no basis for granting a new trial. The judgment accordingly is

Affirmed.

1

. 68A Stat. 550 (1954), as amended, 23 TJ.S.C. § 4704(a) (Supp. V, 1958).

2

. 35 Stat. 614 (1909), as amended, 21 U.S. C.A. § 174 (Supp. V, 1958).

3

. 18 U.S.C. § 111 (1952); R..S.D.C. § 432, as amended, D.C.Code § 22-505 (Supp. VI, 1958).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On this appeal from a judgment of-conviction of possession of narcotics, not in the original stamped package 1 and illegally imported, 2 and of assaults on both a federal narcotics officer and a District of Columbia policeman in performance of their duties, 3 counsel appointed by this court has ably and conscientiously presented the several questions worthy of consideration in determining whether the judgment should be reversed. We have considered each of these questions but find no basis for granting a new trial. The judgment accordingly is

Affirmed.

1

. 68A Stat. 550 (1954), as amended, 23 TJ.S.C. § 4704(a) (Supp. V, 1958).

2

. 35 Stat. 614 (1909), as amended, 21 U.S. C.A. § 174 (Supp. V, 1958).

3

. 18 U.S.C. § 111 (1952); R..S.D.C. § 432, as amended, D.C.Code § 22-505 (Supp. VI, 1958).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 F.2d 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-s-osborne-v-united-states-cadc-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack