Lawrence Ray Jackson v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 6, 2023
Docket04-22-00845-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Lawrence Ray Jackson v. the State of Texas (Lawrence Ray Jackson v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lawrence Ray Jackson v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

FILE COPY

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 6, 2023

No. 04-22-00845-CR

Lawrence Ray JACKSON, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018CR4080B Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell, Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellant Lawrence Ray Jackson entered into a plea bargain with the State, pursuant to which he pleaded nolo contendere to the charged offense. The trial court imposed a sentence on September 14, 2022 in accordance with the agreement and signed a certificate stating this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). This court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id. The clerk’s record includes the written plea bargain agreement which includes a waiver of the right to appeal those matter that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial. See id. 25.2(d). The record establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See id. 25.2(a)(2). The record also appears to support the trial court’s certification that Appellant does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate).

We therefore order appellant to file a response, by January 26, 2023, establishing an amended certification showing he has the right to appeal has been made part of the appellate record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1. If a supplemental clerk’s record is required to show appellant has the right to appeal, appellant must request a supplemental record from the trial court clerk and file a copy of the request with this court. If appellant fails to satisfactorily respond to this order within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed. FILE COPY

We order all appellate deadlines suspended until further order of the court. We further order the clerk of this court to serve copies of this order on the attorneys of record and the court reporter.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 6th day of January, 2023.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dears v. State
154 S.W.3d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lawrence Ray Jackson v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-ray-jackson-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.