Lawrence R. Homo, Jr. v. M. Cox, Sheriff J.E. Richardson, Sheriff W.O. Staples, Deputy Sheriff

Fourth Circuit

Lawrence R. Homo, Jr. v. M. Cox, Sheriff J.E. Richardson, Sheriff W.O. Staples, Deputy Sheriff

21 F.3d 422, 1994 WL 112764

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 4, 1994·No. 94-6012·Published

Opinion

21 F.3d 422
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Lawrence R. HOMO, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
M. COX, Sheriff; J.E. Richardson, Sheriff; W.O. Staples,
Deputy Sheriff, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6012.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 17, 1994.
Decided April 4, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge.

Lawrence R. Homo, Jr., appellant Pro Se.

Randy Virlin Cargill, Woods, Rogers & Hazlegrove, Roanoke, VA, for appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Homo v. Cox, No. CA-93-424-R (W.D. Va. Nov. 29, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

21 F.3d 422
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Lawrence R. HOMO, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
M. COX, Sheriff; J.E. Richardson, Sheriff; W.O. Staples,
Deputy Sheriff, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6012.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 17, 1994.
Decided April 4, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge.

Lawrence R. Homo, Jr., appellant Pro Se.

Randy Virlin Cargill, Woods, Rogers & Hazlegrove, Roanoke, VA, for appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Homo v. Cox, No. CA-93-424-R (W.D. Va. Nov. 29, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Lawrence R. Homo, Jr. v. M. Cox, Sheriff J.E. Richardson, Sheriff W.O. Staples, Deputy Sheriff, 21 F.3d 422, 1994 WL 112764 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

21 F.3d 422 (Lawrence R. Homo, Jr. v. M. Cox, Sheriff J.E. Richardson, Sheriff W.O. Staples, Deputy Sheriff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.