Lawrence & Pope v. Mayor of Monticello

65 Ga. 298
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 15, 1880
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 65 Ga. 298 (Lawrence & Pope v. Mayor of Monticello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lawrence & Pope v. Mayor of Monticello, 65 Ga. 298 (Ga. 1880).

Opinion

i. Where the judge’s certificate to the bill of exceptions' fails to state that it is true, the writ of error will be dismissed.

3. This defect is not cured by the fact that the bill of exceptions contains nothing but assignments of error upon the grounds taken in the motion for a new trial, and that such grounds appear in the record to have been certified as true by the presiding judge.

Practice in the Supreme Court. February Term, 1880.

“ I do certify that the foregoing bill of exceptions, with the record in the case, contains all the evidence material to a clear understanding of the errors complained of; and the clerk of the superior court of Jasper county is hereby required,” etc.

It was replied that the facts stated in the motion for new trial appeared from the transcript of the record to have been certified as true by the judge, and the bill of exceptions consisted of nothing but assignments of error upon the grounds taken in such motion.

The case was dismissed and the principles stated in the above head-notes enunciated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cady v. Cady
131 S.E. 282 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1926)
Cade v. DuBose
54 S.E. 697 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 Ga. 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-pope-v-mayor-of-monticello-ga-1880.