Lawrence Paul Davenport v. the State of Texas
This text of Lawrence Paul Davenport v. the State of Texas (Lawrence Paul Davenport v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-24-00058-CR __________________
LAWRENCE PAUL DAVENPORT, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 435th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 20-02-02517-CR __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The trial court sentenced Lawrence Paul Davenport on October 10, 2023.
Davenport did not file a motion for new trial within 30 days after the date in which
the trial court imposed sentence. See Tex. R. App. P. 21.4(a). Notice of appeal was
due to be filed on November 9, 2023. Davenport’s time for filing a motion for
extension of time to perfect his appeal expired on November 27, 2023. On December
19, 2023, the District Clerk received and filed a pro se notice of appeal dated
December 13, 2023. On February 21, 2024, the Clerk of the Court notified the parties
1 that the notice of appeal has been filed outside the time for which an extension of
time may be granted for filing notice of appeal, and warned the parties that the appeal
would be dismissed unless grounds were shown for continuing the appeal.
Davenport, through his appointed appellate counsel, obtained additional time to
respond to the Clerk’s notice, but Davenport did not file a response that identifies a
valid basis for this Court to exercise appellate jurisdiction over his appeal.
When a defendant appeals from a conviction in a criminal case, the time to
file a notice of appeal runs from the date sentence is imposed or suspended in open
court. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). An appellate court may extend the time to file the
notice of appeal if, within 15 days after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal,
the defendant files a notice of appeal in the trial court and files a motion for extension
of time in the appellate court. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. Davenport failed to file a
notice of appeal and a motion for an extension of time within the time permitted by
the rule. See id.
“Timely filing of a written notice of appeal is a jurisdictional prerequisite to
hearing an appeal.” Castillo v. State, 369 S.W.3d 196, 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012).
“If a notice of appeal is not timely filed, the court of appeals has no option but to
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.” Id. Davenport does not argue that he
obtained an out-of-time appeal from the Court of Criminal Appeals. We dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
2 APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on April 30, 2024 Opinion Delivered May 1, 2024 Do Not Publish
Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lawrence Paul Davenport v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-paul-davenport-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.