Lawrence Maurice Hill v. PennyMac Holdings, LLC & Stanford Kurland
This text of Lawrence Maurice Hill v. PennyMac Holdings, LLC & Stanford Kurland (Lawrence Maurice Hill v. PennyMac Holdings, LLC & Stanford Kurland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-17-00365-CV
LAWRENCE MAURICE HILL APPELLANT
V.
PENNYMAC HOLDINGS, LLC & APPELLEES STANFORD KURLAND
------------
FROM THE 96TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 096-288693-16
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
On November 15, 2017, and February 6, 2018, we notified appellant in
accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c) that we would dismiss this
appeal unless the $205 filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).
Appellant has not paid the $205 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Because appellant failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of
appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 28, 2015, 2
we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).
Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: KERR, PITTMAN, and BIRDWELL, JJ.
DELIVERED: March 15, 2018
2 See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Aug. 28, 2015) (listing courts of appeals’ fees).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lawrence Maurice Hill v. PennyMac Holdings, LLC & Stanford Kurland, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-maurice-hill-v-pennymac-holdings-llc-stanford-kurland-texapp-2018.