Lawrence Madeksho and Elodia G. Madeksho v. XTO Energy, Inc.
This text of Lawrence Madeksho and Elodia G. Madeksho v. XTO Energy, Inc. (Lawrence Madeksho and Elodia G. Madeksho v. XTO Energy, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-10-00369-CV
LAWRENCE MADEKSHO AND ELODIA G. MADEKSHO, Appellants v.
XTO ENERGY, INC., Appellee
From the 82nd District Court Robertson County, Texas Trial Court No. 07-11-17,957-CV
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant has filed a “Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).
It states that Appellant no longer wishes to purse this appeal and seeks dismissal with
costs to be assessed against the party incurring them. Appellee has not filed a response.
Dismissal of this appeal would not prevent a party from seeking relief to which it
would otherwise be entitled. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed with
each party to pay the costs in this behalf expended as they have been incurred. REX D. DAVIS Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Motion granted; appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed January 12, 2011 [CV06]
Lawrence Madeksho and Elodia G. Madeksho v. XTO Energy, Inc. Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lawrence Madeksho and Elodia G. Madeksho v. XTO Energy, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-madeksho-and-elodia-g-madeksho-v-xto-ener-texapp-2011.