Home/D.C. Circuit/Lawrence M. Blumenthal v. District of Columbia

Lawrence M. Blumenthal v. District of Columbia

269 F.2d 516, 106 U.S. App. D.C. 69, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3743
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJune 4, 1959
Docket14752
StatusPublished

This text of 269 F.2d 516 (Lawrence M. Blumenthal v. District of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lawrence M. Blumenthal v. District of Columbia, 269 F.2d 516, 106 U.S. App. D.C. 69, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3743 (D.C. Cir. 1959).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the granting of a motion for summary judgment in a case where plaintiffs asked the court to declare as void the dedication of certain land for public streets and the acceptance of such dedication by the Commissioners of the District of Columbia, and to declare the title to the real property involved to be in the plaintiffs as successors in interest to the parties dedicating.

We find no error. Cf. Barnard v. Commissioners of the District of Columbia, 1957, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 404, 246 F.2d 685.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John Barnard v. The Commissioners of the District of Columbia, David Karrick, Robert E. McLaughlin Brigadier General Thomas A. Lane
246 F.2d 685 (D.C. Circuit, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 F.2d 516, 106 U.S. App. D.C. 69, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-m-blumenthal-v-district-of-columbia-cadc-1959.