Lawrence Kelvin Walker, Jr. v. State

Opinion

C&ox, (\)o. &- IH-OOOHD'^^

FILED IN COURT OF APPEALS 12th Court of Appeals District

CATHY S. LUSK,

IMouJ tfm^s^ (Vp^&tUWT in THE fttfco'^ ST>fL£0 / M/m6e£CO <^-i/5£^ i )tt)f>vtS TWO &yfer To

LThis OK ]s> g/\ ^pp^l rro'w +W (N^ XoL!t;*J lOiafyrt-f- (jms\-tf Sn^A

(A* fliMeufajT ijjfe coAvrctfd of [/ide/vKe^Y Mt« AC^MD Se/wh. 6-vt-^t, f

i "(U jfyjfclUri Pro V. £rt*f is ^ soorv >^.i( bt L^ M Tftci^.'tk-

n) 1VwCvtt^Tdily i/'itwej. iW, £P^+" trmscrip+i ->Wf- S>mi f-U Cow-fry

y) \ (jfclfl'Y h#A/e fW. opflortuAivy "V* vie^o \W records dally' 0Afy J^ C-J) It tf u/\l^viowo^ >f Iva>;1^ W^ tW rtc^rds } sJm^ I ^;((

H. /WlUvi' o&j^V- <* P4(i^~ opy of tW cUr^s retards (frmscriffd

6?u,«.T ^( 0£^»A )fVfp(2i>pifrTt, /byed-fu IL SirbtifHcly

9-bti £&sf Fl 7//e/; 7x 757£U /?y- Pro Jk AfCwLg