Lawrence Joseph Gall v. the State of Texas
This text of Lawrence Joseph Gall v. the State of Texas (Lawrence Joseph Gall v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-23-00578-CR
Lawrence Joseph GALL, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021CR8257 Honorable Joel Perez, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
Delivered and Filed: August 2, 2023
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION
The trial court imposed sentence in the underlying cause on March 23, 2023. Because
appellant did not file a motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was due to be filed on April 22,
2023. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was
due on May 7, 2023. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Appellant filed notices of appeal on May 30, 2023 and
June 1, 2023 and filed a motion for extension of time on May 31, 2023. Because the notice of
appeal was untimely filed, this court ordered appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal
should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. On July 12, 2023, appellant’s appointed counsel 04-23-00578-CR
filed a response that did not dispute that the notice of appeal was untimely but explained that
counsel was not appointed until June 1, 2023.
A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’s jurisdiction. See Olivo
v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). A late notice of appeal may be considered
timely so as to invoke a court of appeals’s jurisdiction if (1) it is filed within fifteen days of the
last day allowed for filing, (2) a motion for extension of time is filed in the court of appeals within
fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal, and (3) the court of appeals
grants the motion for extension of time. Id. Because appellant did not file a timely notice of appeal
or request for extension of time to file a notice of appeal, this appeal is dismissed for want of
jurisdiction. See id.; see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1991) (out-of-time appeal from final felony conviction may be sought by filing writ of habeas
corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure).
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lawrence Joseph Gall v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-joseph-gall-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.