Lawrence Johnson & Co. v. United States
140 F. 116, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4770
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided June 1, 1905·No. No. 3,620·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
(orally). This court in another case between these same parties (124 Fed. 1000) affirmed the decision of the Board of General Appraisers holding that certain skins known as “cabretta skins” were properly classified for duty under paragraphs 358 and 360, Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule K, 30 Stat. 183 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1666]. I am constrained to follow the decision of Judge Hazel in the case referred to, and therefore the decision of the Board of General Appraisers is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lawrence Johnson & Co. v. United States, 140 F. 116, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4770 (circtsdny 1905).
140 F. 116 (Lawrence Johnson & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Johnson v. United States
166 F. 728 (Second Circuit, 1908)
Lawrence Johnson & Co. v. United States
159 F. 189 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1907)