Lawrence Johnson & Co. v. United States

140 F. 116, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4770
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedJune 1, 1905
DocketNo. 3,620
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 140 F. 116 (Lawrence Johnson & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lawrence Johnson & Co. v. United States, 140 F. 116, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4770 (circtsdny 1905).

Opinion

TOWNSEND, Circuit Judge

(orally). This court in another case between these same parties (124 Fed. 1000) affirmed the decision of the Board of General Appraisers holding that certain skins known as “cabretta skins” were properly classified for duty under paragraphs 358 and 360, Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule K, 30 Stat. 183 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1666]. I am constrained to follow the decision of Judge Hazel in the case referred to, and therefore the decision of the Board of General Appraisers is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. United States
166 F. 728 (Second Circuit, 1908)
Lawrence Johnson & Co. v. United States
159 F. 189 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 F. 116, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-johnson-co-v-united-states-circtsdny-1905.