LAWRENCE HENRY HUNT  vs STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida

LAWRENCE HENRY HUNT vs STATE OF FLORIDA

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 8, 2022

Docket21-0784

StatusPublished

This text of LAWRENCE HENRY HUNT vs STATE OF FLORIDA (LAWRENCE HENRY HUNT vs STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

LAWRENCE HENRY HUNT vs STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED LAWRENCE HENRY HUNT,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D21-784 LT Case No. 2020-CF-000088-A STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. ________________________________/

Opinion filed April 8, 2022

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County, Richard A. Howard, Judge. Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Ali L. Hansen, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

WOZNIAK, J.

In this Anders 1 appeal, we affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence.

1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). However, we remand for entry of an amended order of probation to conform

with the orally pronounced sentence imposing lifetime sex offender probation

solely on Counts III and IV. See, e.g., Roberts v. State, 252 So. 3d 424, 424

(Fla. 5th DCA 2018) (affirming Anders appeal but remanding for correction

of scrivener’s error).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions.

WALLIS and TRAVER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI