Lawrence Fingerle v. City of Ann Arbor
This text of Lawrence Fingerle v. City of Ann Arbor (Lawrence Fingerle v. City of Ann Arbor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
November 4, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
150819 Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein LAWRENCE FINGERLE, Joan L. Larsen, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices
v SC: 150819 COA: 310352 Washtenaw CC: 11-000228-CZ CITY OF ANN ARBOR, Defendant-Appellee, and AMERICAN FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 2, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the majority opinion and AFFIRM the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in the concurring opinion, to wit, that the plaintiff cannot make the requisite showing of “substantial proximate cause.” MCL 691.1416(l).
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. November 4, 2015 t1028 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lawrence Fingerle v. City of Ann Arbor, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-fingerle-v-city-of-ann-arbor-mich-2015.