Lawrence Ernest Pasta v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Lawrence Ernest Pasta v. United States

396 F.2d 952, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6248

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJuly 2, 1968

Docket25983_1

StatusPublished

This text of 396 F.2d 952 (Lawrence Ernest Pasta v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lawrence Ernest Pasta v. United States, 396 F.2d 952, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6248 (5th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court denying the motion of appellant to proceed under Section 2255, Title 28 is correct. Appellant’s relief is clearly precluded by the decision of this court in Rosecrans v. United States, 378 F.2d 561 (CA 5-1965) and by the decision of *953 the Third Circuit in United States v. Gallagher, 183 F.2d 342 (CA 3-1950) cert. den. Gallagher v. United States, 340 U.S. 913, 71 S.Ct. 283, 95 L.Ed. 659.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court denying the motion of appellant to proceed under Section 2255, Title 28 is correct. Appellant’s relief is clearly precluded by the decision of this court in Rosecrans v. United States, 378 F.2d 561 (CA 5-1965) and by the decision of *953 the Third Circuit in United States v. Gallagher, 183 F.2d 342 (CA 3-1950) cert. den. Gallagher v. United States, 340 U.S. 913, 71 S.Ct. 283, 95 L.Ed. 659.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

396 F.2d 952, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-ernest-pasta-v-united-states-ca5-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack