Lawrence Elliott Dawson, Jr., and James B. Dawson, Minors, by Their Father and Next Friend, Lawrence E. Dawson v. Hillsborough County, Florida, School Board, No. 71-1169 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

Fifth Circuit

Lawrence Elliott Dawson, Jr., and James B. Dawson, Minors, by Their Father and Next Friend, Lawrence E. Dawson v. Hillsborough County, Florida, School Board, No. 71-1169 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

445 F.2d 308

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedAugust 13, 1971

Docket308

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 445 F.2d 308 (Lawrence Elliott Dawson, Jr., and James B. Dawson, Minors, by Their Father and Next Friend, Lawrence E. Dawson v. Hillsborough County, Florida, School Board, No. 71-1169 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lawrence Elliott Dawson, Jr., and James B. Dawson, Minors, by Their Father and Next Friend, Lawrence E. Dawson v. Hillsborough County, Florida, School Board, No. 71-1169 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I, 445 F.2d 308 (5th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

445 F.2d 308

Lawrence Elliott DAWSON, Jr., and James B. Dawson, minors,
by their father and next friend, Lawrence E.
Dawson, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA, SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 71-1169 Summary Calendar.*
*Rule 18, 5th Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431
F.2d 409, Part I.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 14, 1971, Rehearing Denied and Rehearing En Banc Denied
Aug. 13, 1971.

David C. G. Kerr, Wm. Terrell Hodges, W. Crosby Few, Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Tampa, Fla., for defendant-appellant.

David A. Maney, Tampa, Fla., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida; Ben Krentzman, District Judge, 322 F.Supp. 286.

Before WISDOM, COLEMAN, and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In an extensively detailed opinion, the District Judge found as a fact that there was no necessity for the hair style regulations promulgated by the Hillsborough County School Board, 322 F.Supp. 286. On the record, these findings are not clearly erroneous.

The judgment of the District Court, therefore, is affirmed, Ferrell v. Dallas Independent School District, 5 Cir., 1968, 392 F.2d 697; Griffin v. Tatum, 5 Cir., 1970, 425 F.2d 201.

Affirmed.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.

WISDOM, Circuit Judge, not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

445 F.2d 308

Lawrence Elliott DAWSON, Jr., and James B. Dawson, minors,
by their father and next friend, Lawrence E.
Dawson, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA, SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 71-1169 Summary Calendar.*
*Rule 18, 5th Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431
F.2d 409, Part I.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 14, 1971, Rehearing Denied and Rehearing En Banc Denied
Aug. 13, 1971.

David C. G. Kerr, Wm. Terrell Hodges, W. Crosby Few, Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Tampa, Fla., for defendant-appellant.

David A. Maney, Tampa, Fla., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida; Ben Krentzman, District Judge, 322 F.Supp. 286.

Before WISDOM, COLEMAN, and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In an extensively detailed opinion, the District Judge found as a fact that there was no necessity for the hair style regulations promulgated by the Hillsborough County School Board, 322 F.Supp. 286. On the record, these findings are not clearly erroneous.

The judgment of the District Court, therefore, is affirmed, Ferrell v. Dallas Independent School District, 5 Cir., 1968, 392 F.2d 697; Griffin v. Tatum, 5 Cir., 1970, 425 F.2d 201.

Affirmed.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.

WISDOM, Circuit Judge, not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

445 F.2d 308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-elliott-dawson-jr-and-james-b-dawson-minors-by-their-father-ca5-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack