Lawrence Azure v. Candace Stordahl

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided May 26, 2023·No. 22-2946·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 22-2946 ___________________________

Lawrence A. Azure

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Candace Kay Stordahl, ICR no. 20001384; Troy Peter Cymbaluk, ICR no. 20001392; Hannah, LNU; Andrew Larson, Executive Director of Polk, Norman, and Red Lake; Polk County Sheriff's Department

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________

Submitted: May 23, 2023 Filed: May 26, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________

Before COLLOTON, ERICKSON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM. Lawrence Azure appeals following the district court’s1 dismissal of his civil action for failure to prosecute. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Smith v. Gold Dust Casino, 526 F.3d 402, 404-05 (8th Cir. 2008) (dismissal for failure to prosecute or comply with order reviewed for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny the motion to supplement the record. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Nancy E. Brasel, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Elizabeth Cowan Wright, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lawrence Azure v. Candace Stordahl, (8th Cir. 2023).

Lawrence Azure v. Candace Stordahl (Lawrence Azure v. Candace Stordahl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Gold Dust Casino
526 F.3d 402 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)