Lawrence Azure v. Candace Stordahl
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 22-2946 ___________________________
Lawrence A. Azure
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Candace Kay Stordahl, ICR no. 20001384; Troy Peter Cymbaluk, ICR no. 20001392; Hannah, LNU; Andrew Larson, Executive Director of Polk, Norman, and Red Lake; Polk County Sheriff's Department
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________
Submitted: May 23, 2023 Filed: May 26, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________
Before COLLOTON, ERICKSON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM. Lawrence Azure appeals following the district court’s1 dismissal of his civil action for failure to prosecute. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Smith v. Gold Dust Casino, 526 F.3d 402, 404-05 (8th Cir. 2008) (dismissal for failure to prosecute or comply with order reviewed for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny the motion to supplement the record. ______________________________
1 The Honorable Nancy E. Brasel, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Elizabeth Cowan Wright, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lawrence Azure v. Candace Stordahl (Lawrence Azure v. Candace Stordahl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.