Lawrence A. McLernon v. Dynegy, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Lawrence A. McLernon v. Dynegy, Inc.

DecidedJuly 26, 2011

Docket14-09-00312-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Lawrence A. McLernon v. Dynegy, Inc. (Lawrence A. McLernon v. Dynegy, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lawrence A. McLernon v. Dynegy, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

July 26, 2011

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals LAWRENCE A. MCLERNON, Appellant

NO. 14-09-00312-CV V.

DYNEGY, INC., Appellee ____________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Dynegy, Inc., signed January 8, 2009, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find the trial court did not err by granting summary judgment in favor of appellee, Dynegy, Inc., and denying summary judgment in favor of appellant, Lawrence A. McLernon, but the final judgment requires modification with respect to the relief granted. We therefore REFORM the judgment of the court below to order that Dynegy, Inc. have and recover from Lawrence A. McLernon $1,881,716.85 in principal and interest, costs of court, and post-judgment interest on the total judgment at 5% per annum.

We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED except as modified in this judgment.

We order appellant, Lawrence A. McLernon, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

July 26, 2011

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals LAWRENCE A. MCLERNON, Appellant

NO. 14-09-00312-CV V.

DYNEGY, INC., Appellee ____________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Dynegy, Inc., signed January 8, 2009, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find the trial court did not err by granting summary judgment in favor of appellee, Dynegy, Inc., and denying summary judgment in favor of appellant, Lawrence A. McLernon, but the final judgment requires modification with respect to the relief granted. We therefore REFORM the judgment of the court below to order that Dynegy, Inc. have and recover from Lawrence A. McLernon $1,881,716.85 in principal and interest, costs of court, and post-judgment interest on the total judgment at 5% per annum.

We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED except as modified in this judgment.

We order appellant, Lawrence A. McLernon, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Lawrence A. McLernon v. Dynegy, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawrence-a-mclernon-v-dynegy-inc-texapp-2011.