Lawman v. Peoples Savings & Trust Co.
This text of 123 A. 676 (Lawman v. Peoples Savings & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a suit to recover damages for the alleged fraudulent destruction of a codicil to the will of plaintiff’s mother, by which, it is averred, testatrix gave her daughter an income considerably larger than provided for the latter in the probated document. As is correctly said by the court below, plaintiff, in prior proceedings recited in her statement of claim, shows “a complete adjudication [against herself] of the question of whether or not there ever was......in the hands of these defendants,......a codicil” such as she now alleges: see Lawman’s Est., 272 Pa. 237. This being the case, no error was committed in sustaining the demurrer and entering judgment for defendants.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
123 A. 676, 279 Pa. 151, 1924 Pa. LEXIS 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawman-v-peoples-savings-trust-co-pa-1924.