Lawless v. Pitchford

1911 OK 404, 126 P. 782, 33 Okla. 633, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 764
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided November 14, 1911·No. 1067·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

WILLIAMS, J.

Rule 25 of this court (20 Okla. xii, 95 Pac. viii) provides in part as follows:

“The brief shall contain the specifications of the errors complained of, separately set forth and numbered; the argument and authorities in support of each point relied on, in the same order.”

The brief of the plaintiff in error in no respect complies with the provisions of said rule.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

TURNER, C. J., and HAYES, KANE, and DUNN, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lawless v. Pitchford, 1911 OK 404, 126 P. 782, 33 Okla. 633, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 764 (Okla. 1911).

1911 OK 404 (Lawless v. Pitchford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cherry v. Boyles
1931 OK 494 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1931)
Ball v. Hall
1916 OK 845 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)
Cox v. Kirkwood
1916 OK 686 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)
Worrell v. Fellows
1913 OK 680 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
McDonald Coal Co. v. Equitable Powder Manufacturing Co.
1913 OK 337 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
Indian Land & Trust Co. v. Widner
1913 OK 102 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)