Lawless v. Orr
This text of 50 S.E. 85 (Lawless v. Orr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The failure to file a claim to property which has been levied on will not estop the true owner from asserting his title by an action of trover against the purchaser at the sale under the execution, such owner having done nothing that had a tendency to mislead the purchaser as to the owner’s relation to the property and the title. McLennan v. Graham, 106 Ga. 211, and cases cited on page 214. It was therefore not error to refuse to give in charge to the jury a contention of one of the parties, at variance with the principle of law announced in the foregoing.
2. Newly discovered evidence which is merely impeaching in character is not ground for a new trial. Hardy v. State, 117 Ga. 40.
3. The evidence amply warranted a verdict for the plaintiff, and it was not error to refuse a new trial. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 S.E. 85, 122 Ga. 276, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawless-v-orr-ga-1905.