Lawless v. City of Buffalo
197 A.D.2d 937, 604 N.Y.S.2d 844
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lawless v. City of Buffalo. Read the opinion of the Court — 177 A.D.2d 1007 →
Opinion
—Motion for extension of time to file respondent’s briefs denied as unnecessary. Memorandum: Respondent’s motion for an extension of time to file briefs is unnecessary because appellant has not filed a demand for respondent’s brief (see, 22 NYCRR 1000.7 [a]). Present— Pine, J. P., Balio, Lawton, Boomer and Davis, JJ. (Filed Sept. 17, 1993.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lawless v. City of Buffalo, 197 A.D.2d 937, 604 N.Y.S.2d 844 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).
197 A.D.2d 937 (Lawless v. City of Buffalo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.