Lawler v. Clinton Street Development Properties, Inc.

63 A.D.2d 827, 406 N.Y.S.2d 186, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11788
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 19, 1978·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Special Term properly dismissed the complaint for a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief. There was no showing of any necessity for such relief or that plaintiff’s contractual rights, if any, could not be fully adjudicated in an [828]*828action at law (CPLR 3001; see Walsh v Andorn, 33 NY2d 503, 507; James v Alderton Dock Yards, 256 NY 298, 305; Seaboard Sur. Co. v Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co., 42 Misc 2d 435, 436). (Appeal from order of Onondaga Supreme Court—declaratory judgment.) Present—Moule, J. P., Cardamone, Simons, Schnepp and Hancock, Jr., JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lawler v. Clinton Street Development Properties, Inc., 63 A.D.2d 827, 406 N.Y.S.2d 186, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11788 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

63 A.D.2d 827 (Lawler v. Clinton Street Development Properties, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Salomon Bros. v. West Virginia State Board of Investments
152 Misc. 2d 289 (New York Supreme Court, 1990)
Lawler v. Clinton Street Development Properties, Inc.
72 A.D.2d 965 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)