Lawhorn v. State

299 S.W. 413, 108 Tex. Crim. 202, 1927 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 650
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 9, 1927
DocketNo. 11229.
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 299 S.W. 413 (Lawhorn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lawhorn v. State, 299 S.W. 413, 108 Tex. Crim. 202, 1927 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 650 (Tex. 1927).

Opinion

MARTIN, Judge.

Offense, the unlawful possession of mash and a still for the purpose of manufacturing intoxicating liquor; penalty, one year in the penitentiary.

A search warrant was issued to search the “dwelling house and outbuildings” of appellant. This was based upon an affidavit of one Leverett and Walker alleging “that he has good reasons to believe and does believe that Sam Lawhorn is engaged in the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor, and keeps and possesses for the purpose of sale intoxicating liquors,” in and near said dwelling house and outbuildings.

The officers testified over objection of appellant that they searched “the home of the defendant, Sam Lawhorn, and found on said premises a still and two and one-half barrels of mash.” This was objected to for many reasons, among which were that the above affidavit does not state as a fact that intoxicating liquors were possessed for sale by defendant, that it was upon information and belief, and the search warrant was based upon an affidavit containing hearsay evidence only, and that nothing was before the justice of the peace from which he could determine if probable cause existed.

The action of the court in the admission of said evidence came within the rule laid down in Chapin v. State, 296 S. W. 1095, and within the provision of Arts. 4a and 727a, C. C. P., and Art. 691 P. C., and was erroneous.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson v. State
59 S.W.2d 399 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1933)
Nelson v. State
14 S.W.2d 847 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Blanks v. State
3 S.W.2d 448 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Cochran v. State
2 S.W.2d 451 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Rozner v. State
3 S.W.2d 441 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
299 S.W. 413, 108 Tex. Crim. 202, 1927 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawhorn-v-state-texcrimapp-1927.