Lawhon-Griffis v. State

222 So. 3d 603, 2017 WL 3085347, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10452
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 19, 2017
DocketNo. 4D16-3261
StatusPublished

This text of 222 So. 3d 603 (Lawhon-Griffis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lawhon-Griffis v. State, 222 So. 3d 603, 2017 WL 3085347, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10452 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Kristina Lawhon-Griffis appeals the summary denial of her Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. We conclude that the trial court erred in denying the motion as successive because appellant’s previous Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170 motion to withdraw her plea, which was untimely, should have been dismissed without prejudice to filing a proper rule 3.850 motion. See Watson v. State, 111 So.3d 205 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). We therefore reverse and remand for the trial court to consider appellant’s second motion on the merits.

Reversed and remanded.

Warner, Gross and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Watson v. State
111 So. 3d 205 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
222 So. 3d 603, 2017 WL 3085347, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawhon-griffis-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.