Lawhon-Griffis v. State

222 So. 3d 603, 2017 WL 3085347, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10452
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 19, 2017·No. No. 4D16-3261·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Kristina Lawhon-Griffis appeals the summary denial of her Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. We conclude that the trial court erred in denying the motion as successive because appellant’s previous Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170 motion to withdraw her plea, which was untimely, should have been dismissed without prejudice to filing a proper rule 3.850 motion. See Watson v. State, 111 So.3d 205 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). We therefore reverse and remand for the trial court to consider appellant’s second motion on the merits.

Reversed and remanded.

Warner, Gross and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lawhon-Griffis v. State, 222 So. 3d 603, 2017 WL 3085347, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10452 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

222 So. 3d 603 (Lawhon-Griffis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Watson v. State
111 So. 3d 205 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)