Lawbaugh v. Sweeney

237 A.D. 788, 262 N.Y.S. 830, 1933 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10729
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 10, 1933
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 237 A.D. 788 (Lawbaugh v. Sweeney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lawbaugh v. Sweeney, 237 A.D. 788, 262 N.Y.S. 830, 1933 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10729 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Townley, J.

This is a companion appeal to that in the same action, decision of which is herewith handed down (Matter of McNally v. Youngs, 238 App. Div. 787). As it is therein held that no substitution of attorneys was made, it must be deemed that there has been as yet no effective discharge of the former attorney. Accordingly, the court should not direct him to recognize the substituted attorney.

The order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied.

Finch, P. J., Mekrell, Martin and Sherman, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ratner v. Lehigh Valley Railroad
26 Misc. 2d 981 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
237 A.D. 788, 262 N.Y.S. 830, 1933 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawbaugh-v-sweeney-nyappdiv-1933.