Lawanna Tabbee, Cordie Maez, Roselda Jones, Robert G. Burson, the Estate Of, and Others Similarly Situated v. United States
This text of 36 F.3d 1114 (Lawanna Tabbee, Cordie Maez, Roselda Jones, Robert G. Burson, the Estate Of, and Others Similarly Situated v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
36 F.3d 1114
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Lawanna TABBEE, Cordie Maez, Roselda Jones, Robert G.
Burson, The Estate of, and others similarly
situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 94-5120.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Aug. 25, 1994.
30 Fed.Cl. 828.
DISMISSED.
ORDER
Counsel having failed to become a member of the bar of this court as required by the Federal Circuit Rule 46, it is
ORDERED that the appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 F.3d 1114, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 24057, 1994 WL 513587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lawanna-tabbee-cordie-maez-roselda-jones-robert-g-burson-the-estate-cafc-1994.